 |
 |
HON STEVE MAHAREY Minister of Social Services and Employment
Community Services Card Fact Sheet
- As a result of the 1 April 2001 increase in rates of NZ Superannuation
approximately 1,270 Superannuitants currently eligible for a Community
Services Card would have lost their entitlement.
- Cabinet agreed on Monday 23 April that no superannuitant who was entitled
to a Community Services Card before 1 April 2001 should lose their entitlement
to the Community Services Card as a consequence of the increase New
Zealand Superannuation rates on 1 April 2001.
Community Services Card Policy
- Community Services Cards were announced in National's 1991 'Mother
of All Budgets' and introduced on 1 February 1992
- Community Services Cards provide a subsidy for GP visits and pharmaceuticals
for low to middle income earners.
- Beneficiaries are automatically entitled to a Community Services Card.
- New Zealand Superannuitants, students and working people can apply
for the Cards, and their eligibility is determined in part by an income
test.
- The are about 1.1 million Cards in circulation.
The issue
- Government increased the rates of NZS/VP, social security benefits,
and student allowances on 1 April 2001 to take into account the 3.98%
increase in the CPI.
- Because beneficiaries are automatically entitled to a Community Services
Card, the CPI increase had no impact on their Card eligibility.
- Working people's eligibility for Community Services Cards was not
affected by the CPI increases in benefits.
- However, as a direct result of the 1 April 2001 CPI increase in New
Zealand Superannuation, an estimated 1270 Superannuitants were expected
to lose their Cards. This is because the combination of their NZS, private
income and CPI increase pushed them over the edge of the CSC income
thresholds.
- Not only would this have negated the CPI cost of living adjustment
for the Superannuitants affected, they could have actually be made financially
worse off due to high health care needs.
What Government has NOT done
- Government has NOT made any change to Community Services Card thresholds
- Government has NOT made any policy decisions that would mean working
people were treated differently to beneficiaries with respect to Community
Services Card eligibility
What National Have Been Saying
Bob Simcock has claimed that CSC thresholds had traditionally always increased
with benefit adjustments:
"It is not automatic - it's not one of those things that just happens
by law - but I understand it has always occurred at the same time."
The Dominion April 17 2001
FACT
National NEVER increased the CSC threshold in relation to benefit CPI
increases.
The threshold was increased in 1996 and 1997 in relation to movement
in the level of family support - not CPI. (Some rates also moved in 1994
when the scheme was expanded).
Our 2000 general increase was the first time it had moved along with
benefit CPI changes.
In other words, year after year National saw Superannuitants lose their
community services card entitlements as Super was CPI adjusted - for example
it is estimated that some 1,503 superannuitants moved over the income
threshold due to National's CPI adjustment in 1995. National did nothing
to protect their CSC assess.
We didn't think that that was fair or right. In 2000 we moved to protect
their interests AND increased the general threshold (the first increase
since 1997).
This year we have again acted to protect Superannuitants access to the
CSC. This is because we acknowledge that older New Zealanders face higher
health costs and cannot chose to forego the CPI increase to their pensions.
Does this create a new inequity between those
on a benefit and working families?
No.
Income tested beneficiaries have always received the CSC automatically.
This was done to lower administrative costs and to ensure take-up (you
will recall how unpopular the 'poor card' originally was).
So a few beneficiaries over the income threshold for CSC have always
received the CSC.
For example as at 25 April 1997 3,348 beneficiaries over the threshold
still got the card.
Of course these people were those facing great difficulty with high
disability costs, high housing costs and special costs.
What this illustrates is that there always have been problems with the
CSC system in that low income workers, Superannuitants, students, etc
face a separate income test whereas beneficiaries do not.
The real problem is with the Community Services Card itself.
The threshold system is a simple cut out. Earn one dollar over the threshold
and next time your card is due for renewal you will lose it.
Bottom line: The CSC is a very blunt tool fraught with inequities and
difficulties.
Historical Community Services Card Income Limits
| FAMILY SIZE |
01/04/00 (5) Current |
01/07/97 (4) |
01/07/96 (3) |
01/02/94 (2) |
01/02/92 (1) |
| Single Sharing Accommodation |
$18,586 |
$17,769 |
$17,134 |
$16,500 |
$16,500 |
| Single Living Alone |
$19,689 |
$18,846 |
$18,173 |
$17,500 |
$17,500 |
| Married couple no dependents |
$29,398 |
$28,000 |
$27,000 |
$26,000 |
$23,000 |
| Family
of 2 – 1 adult, 1 child |
$29,398 |
$28,000 |
$27,000 |
$26,000 |
|
| Family of 3 |
$34,243 |
$32,846 |
$31,673 |
$30,500 |
| Family of 4 |
$39,089 |
$37,692 |
$36,346 |
$35,000 |
| Family of 5 |
$43,935 |
$42,538 |
$41,019 |
$39,500 |
| Family of 6 |
$48,782 |
$47,385 |
$45,692 |
$44,000 |
| From 1.02.99, additional thresholds for families with more than 6 members were introduced. For each additional child add $4,840 to the income limit. |
- Original rates. (full family support = group 1 card; abated family support = group 2 card)
- Interim scheme made "permanent" and rates introduced relating to family size rather than family support formula in (1)
above. No longer any group 2 cards.
- & (4) Increases due to changes (increases) to rates of Family Support
- This increase (Labour govt.) was the first time that increases were related to benefit/super adjustment.
|
 |