| Archive - these pages are part of the continuing record of Executive Government - for the current Administration, see www.beehive.govt.nz |
|
|
[March 1999]
Other specific objectives of the quantitative research stage were:
The margin of error for a 50% figure at the 95% confidence level is plus or minus 5.2%.
Fieldwork was conducted from 12th March to 18th March 1999 at UMR Insight's national interview facility in Auckland.
Telephone interviewing was conducted during standard work hours of 9.00am to 5.00pm unless a call-back appointment was specifically booked for a time outside those hours.
Six call-backs were made to initially selected respondents to reduce non-response due to unavailability.
Some totals in tables in the attached report will not add to 100% because of rounding.
47% of those who declared they would "wait and see" thought they would eventually end up with a private sector insurance company and 15% that they would stay with the ACC. The remainder were unsure.
This declared response was in answer to a prompted set of options which some of the self employed may not have yet thought about to a great extent.
There are also always steps to be negotiated before declared intentions measured in any survey translate into actual behaviour. This is especially the case if complex steps are required to realise the behaviour and if high costs are involved.
- 66% considered that it was likely and 24% not likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "more incentive for employers to improve workplace safety".
- 61% considered that it was likely and 18% not likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "better service than ACC currently provides".
- 52% considered that it was likely and 38% not likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "lower premiums".
- 50% considered that it was likely and 35% not likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "faster rehabilitation of injured workers".
- 30% considered that it was likely and 54% not likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "fewer accidents in the work place".
Of the negative statements tested:
- 49% considered that it was likely and 34% not likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "under reporting of accidents".
- 38% considered that it was likely and 43% not likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "injured employees being forced back to work too soon".
- 26% declared they would "be ready to switch to a private sector insurer by 1st July";
- 19% that they would stay with the ACC as it is now;
- 3% declared they would choose to insure with a new State-Owned Enterprise;
- 12% were unsure or volunteered a conditional answer with a further 1% rejecting all options presented.
As already noted care is needed in interpreting declared intentions in surveys.
Those who declared they would "wait and see" were also asked if they thought it was more likely that they would end up with a private sector insurance company or stay with ACC.
47% declared they would end up with a private sector insurance company and 15% that they would stay with the ACC with 38% unsure or volunteering a conditional answer.
Those with an insurance broker were more likely to be ready to switch to a private sector company. Amongst this group 37% declared they would be ready to switch, 32% that they would wait and see and 15% that they would stay with ACC. Amongst the self employed who did not use an insurance broker 15% declared they would be ready to switch, 46% that they would wait and see and 23% that they would remain with the ACC.
Amongst the self employed who declared they knew a lot or a fair amount about the reforms 39% declared they would be ready to switch to a private insurer by 1st July, 30% that they would "wait and see", 16% that they would stay with ACC, 3% that they would insure with the new SOE with 12% unsure or volunteering conditional answers.
Amongst those who were not aware of the reforms and those, who while aware of the reforms declared they had not that much or hardly any knowledge of the reforms, 16% declared they would be ready to switch to a private insurer by 1st July, 45% that they would "wait and see", 20% that they would stay with the ACC, 2% that they would insure with the new SOE with 15% unsure or volunteering conditional answers.
Amongst all who remembered receiving the information pack a high 92% indicated they had kept it.
The ACC Reforms
- A Quantitative Study
Amongst Self-Employed
UMR Insight Limited
E-mail: umr@umrinsight.co.nz
Objectives
The primary objective of this survey was:
Methodology
This report is based on results of a telephone survey of 350 self employed New Zealanders that earned over $14,000 in the last tax year. A random selection of telephone numbers was provided by the ACC which was loaded directly into UMR Insight's CATI system. The CATI sample management system automatically randomises the telephone numbers provided to interviewers.
General Setting
Awareness of Reforms
Attitude to the Reforms
- 69% considered that it was very or fairly likely and 14% that it was not that or not at all likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "more account being taken of the particular circumstances of individual companies".
- 65% considered that it was likely and 24% not likely that the ACC reforms would lead to "more disputes and more work for lawyers".
Response to Reforms
- 39% of self employed declared they would wait and see how the market develops before making up their mind;
Information